The Government has announced that it will not publish any school or college level educational performance data based on tests, assessments or exams for 2020, and has outlined accountability arrangements for 2020/21. Further information on what this means for the way school and college accountability will operate for 2019/20, 2020/21 and for 2021/22 can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-school-and-college-performance-measures?_ga=2.25394234.625104232.1615822298-535015105.1594219029 

School Results 2019

Year 6

In reading 76% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 73%

of which 20%   passed at a greater depth

School's Average score 103.2  National 104.4

In writing 68% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 78%

of which 24%   passed at a greater depth

In maths 80% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 79%

of which 16%  passed at a greater depth

School's Average score 102.5  National 105

In reading, writing and maths combined 56% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a local average of 61% and a national of 65%.

Progress Scores

Reading  -0.59

Writing - 0.88

Maths  - 2.88

School Result 2018

Year 6

In reading 82% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 75%

of which 41%   passed at a greater depth

School's Average score 107.1  National 105

In writing 88% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 78%

of which 24%   passed at a greater depth

In maths 82% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a national % of 76%

of which 6%  passed at a greater depth

School's Average score 102.2  National 104.4

In reading, writing and maths combined 76% of children at our school achieved the expected standard or above versus a local average of 59% and a national of 64%.

Progress Scores

Reading  -0.08

Writing - 0.66

Maths  - 4.23

Results 2017 

• 1. This group was unusual as 50% are “disadvantaged”, either FSM or had been FSM in the last 6 years. That said our % of groups results are broadly the same for disadvantaged as they are for non-disadvantaged which reflects the positive use of our pupil premium resources.

This cohort had 17 children

Our EYFS data was lower than previous years as we welcomed two children to our school in the summer of 2017, who are part of our data but did not arrive with the benefit of our EYFS and were not at  the same Good Level of Development as many of their Billingborough Peers.

Results in 2016

2016 was a challenging year for primary schools and their assessment procedures (you can read more about the changes on our Assessment page) and for us, like many schools, the changes that surrounded SATS were impactful for the children and the staff.

To avoid the risk of appearing subjective  about a national  situation we would sign post you instead to  an interesting article  here "The Guardian" Dec 2016, which puts the year into context.

We are proud of all our children's achievements and judge this from where they started on their personal educational journey. See our  "TRY" page Click here!

Below are our 2016 Headlines:

Early Years (end of Reception)

This is a small cohort which had 11 children, each child is the equivalent of 9%

91% of the children achieved a "Good Level of Development", that is they achieved national expectations in English and Maths along with personal and social skills. The national % is 69.3%.

Year 1 Phonics Screen

This cohort had 24 pupils, each child is the equivalent of 4%.

21 out of the 23 children who took the screen achieved or surpassed the pass mark, ie 91%, 87% when our absent pupil is included. The national % was 81%.

Key stage 1

This is a small cohort which had 16 children, each child is the equivalent of  6%.

88% achieved the expected standard in reading, national 74 %

56% achieved the expected standard in writing, national  63%

69% achieved the expected standard in maths national 73%

Key stage 2

This is a small cohort which had 16 children, each child is the equivalent of  6%.

NB in this cohort 6 pupils had educational special needs, a further 2 were being observed for suspected undiagnosed learning challenges.

Of our 16 pupils:

56% made the expected standard in reading with an average scaled score of 102.2 and an average progress measure of -0.5. Of the 56% 3 pupils, 18% were  working at greater depth.

50% made the expected standard in writing, with an average progress measure of -0.4. Of the 50% 4 pupils, 25% were  working at greater depth.

38% made the expected standard in maths with an average scaled score of 97 and an average progress measure of -4.9.

As you can read on our Assessment page (link above) we bench marked all of pupils Y1-6 against the new curriculum using our Assertive Mentoring programme in September 2015.

We tracked the Y6 children using Assertive Mentoring throughout their final year.

Reading: the cohort made 1.6 years progress in the 10 months between Sept 2015 to July 2015

Writing: the cohort made 1.7 years progress in the 10 months between Sept 2015 to July 2015

 Maths:  the cohort made 1.3 years progress in the 10 months between Sept 2015 to July 2015

Well done Year 6!

Our school results for the academic year 2015:

(NB Nat = national % for this subject/curriculum area)

Foundation Stage (at the end of Reception)

Year 1 Phonics Screen

Key Stage 1 ( at the end of Year 2)

The expected level at the end of KS1 is a level 2

Our Key Stage 2 Results ( at the end of Year 6)

NB this was a small cohort of only 12 children, so each child counts for 8 %. Because of this we have given specific Progress statistics for this very small group as national comparisons for progress, when a group of 12 are broken down further, can mean 1 child's performance is compared to hundreds or even thousands of others which is not necessarily representative.

• A level 4 is the expected standard at the end of KS2 our 12 children secured:
• L4+ reading 92% (Nat 88%)

• L4+ writing 92% (Nat 87%)
• L4+ maths 92% (Nat 87%)
• L4+ R W & M 83% (Nat 80%)
• Progress since KS1 expected progress is 2 levels from level 1 to 3 , or 2 to 4 or 3 to 5.
• All children: Reading 2 levels progress 92% (Nat 91%)
• All children: Wrting 2 levels progress 92% (Nat 94%)
• All children: Maths 2 levels progress 100% (Nat 90%)
• There was 1 level 1 reader in KS1 and they achieved a level 4 in KS2 ( 3 levels progress)
• There were 4 level 3 readers at KS1 who all achieved level 5's, + 1 other ( who made 3 levels progress)
• There was 1 level 1 writer in KS1 and they achieved a level 4 in KS2 (3 levels progress)
• There were no level 3 writers at KS1 but 4  level 5's at KS2  (3 levels progress)
• In total 5 out of 12 children made 3 levels progress in writing.
• There was 1 level 3 mathematician at KS1, who achieved level 5.  2 further children who had been level 2 achieved level 5's at the end of KS2  (3 levels progress).
• There were no significant variances between the outcomes for disadvantaged pupils, boys or girls.

You can read the Department for Education Performance Tables  Report on last year's Year 6 results here:

http://www.education.gov.uk/cgi-bin/schools/performance/school.pl?urn=120371

NB because of the very small cohort some results show as "Suppressed" because they are too small to statistically compare.